To manage their workforce, many firms relied on touch-based biometric attendance systems like fingerprint recognition, hand geometry recognition, or typing recognition that require physical touch.
But, when COVID-19 struck, the same fast and non-invasive attendance systems became hotspots for spreading the infection. With every touch, the surfaces of these systems pick up and spread bacteria, viruses, and other microorganisms. That’s why many companies and government agencies began to suspend the extensively used touch-based biometric attendance system.
Since then, ensuring that critical services continue to operate while keeping everyone safe has been the biggest challenge in most places.
And yet, the disadvantages of the traditional attendance system are not limited to just the fear of touch that affects employees’ mental and emotional states. There are still many disadvantages that include, but are not limited to:
- Issues with recognition of fingerprints in some cases
There is a lack of flexibility to identify the person in case of a wound or when fingerprints are smudged with dirt or grease. Fingerprint sensors are sensitive, which works in their favor if the fingers are clean, but these sensors are inefficient for industries like mining, construction, and manufacturing. The workforce in these industries either wears safety gear like gloves or has dirt and dust on their fingers. It makes it cumbersome for them to record their attendance.
Relying on hardware sensors that require physical contact makes them less sensitive in case fingers are smudged in oil or grease, or if workers are wearing hand gear.
- Deployment can be expensive
Fingerprint attendance systems are entirely dependent on hardware and peripherals. It is often expensive to scale these systems, as you will need to install hardware at every location. There is no alternative to investing in new hardware every time. Over time, the drawbacks of biometric scanning become obvious for businesses with a primarily distributed workforce, where employees work at remote locations or on expansive production floors.
- Fingerprint data can get stolen
Fingerprint attendance systems often store data about physical traits such as fingerprints and palm veins in a local database. This information is linked to individual workers, and at times, it is essential to keep the data protected. Companies enabling fingerprint attendance systems have to deploy measures to prevent the data from being hacked or stolen
- Not ideal for remote and field workers
Dependence on standalone machines is one of the significant disadvantages of fingerprint identification. Such attendance systems require dedicated hardware to record attendance. Companies cannot deploy standalone kiosks or computers at fields or remote locations.